In practice, this means that in any given month (assuming a 30-day month), the service can only be offline for about 4 minutes and a few seconds, or only about 50 minutes per year. If you want a high-availability service, as a buyer or a seller, the first step is to understand what exactly it means. Before getting there, however, it is necessary to understand what it means. It is now possible for most cloud-based service providers, especially for software-based services, to offer very aggressive service level agreements. With the advent of infrastructure-as-a-service and platform-as-a-service providers, however, the costs of building such a service have decreased dramatically. With the exception of very large, multinational companies, almost no-one could afford such a setup.
For something like this, it’s not enough to simply have a failover cluster of servers in a data center: you must also have multiple redundant energy sources for the data center and even to have replication between multiple geographical locations in case of disasters. It has long been the case that to build systems with this kind of reliability and availability means large costs for companies. For a service to have true high-availability, it needs not only to be always-on, but also to have several “nines” (99.999) of reliability. Availability is also related to reliability: a service that is on 24×7 but goes constantly offline is useless. It embodies the idea of anywhere and anytime access to services, tools and data and is the enabler of visions of a future with companies with no physical offices or of global companies with completely integrated and unified IT systems. High-availability is, ultimately, the holy grail of the cloud. Is contracting with multiple providers the answer? Thoran Rodrigues looks at what "high availability" really means when considering cloud services. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2022.What high availability for cloud services means in the real world It suggested that in programming where the use of offensive words in either French or English is inevitable, broadcasters should acknowledge them by apologizing or advising people in advance in order to allow them to tune out if they prefer. "Even if a station's music targets a younger audience, there is always a choice to be made, and the panel is of the opinion that this choice should always encourage the use of civil language and be sensitive to audience expectations, especially during peak listening hours," the panel wrote.
Only on cloud nine meaning in french code#
However, one of the songs the panel analyzed - "abcdefu" by Gayle - violated the code of ethics because the F-word was used repeatedly and directed "in a very aggressive way" at a series of individuals related to the singer's ex-boyfriend, the panel found.Īccording to the news release, the panel agreed that, even if the occasional F-word is acceptable, broadcasters should try to offer high-quality content and should consider playing edited versions of the songs when possible. It agreed that as a French station, more lenient rules apply to the music it plays, even if the lyrics are in English. The decision from the CBSC, a self-regulatory organization created by private broadcasters to deal with viewer or listener complaints, sided largely with the station, CHXX-FM.
The station argued otherwise, adding that the songs were hits and that the station wanted to "maintain the integrity of the work." The listener acknowledged that the F-word is less severe in French, but argued that English songs broadcast on French stations should be considered English programs. The music in question included uncensored versions of hit songs by Lil Nas X, Ariana Grande and Kid Cudi, and Gayle. The organization said its French-language panel investigated after a listener complained about hearing what she described as "violent, vulgar and sexual" language on a Quebec City pop music radio station. "The CBSC has acknowledged that those words do not have the same severity when used by French speakers, so it established a different standard for the use of the English F-word in French-language programming," the organization wrote in a news release. The council's code of ethics limits use of the F-word on English stations to late evening broadcasts, but notes that the word doesn't have the same "vulgar connotation" in French. In a written decision, the organization said that when the overall programming is in French, only songs where the word is used frequently or to insult someone breach its code of ethics. It's acceptable in most cases for French radio stations to play English songs containing the F-word during the daytime, the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council said Wednesday.
0 kommentar(er)
